یکپارچگی، طبقه و سکولاریسم:‌ به حاشیه‌ رفتن هویت‌های شیعی در میان ایرانیان پراکنده شده در بریتانیا

این مقاله توسط رضا غلامی و آنه‌بله اسربرنی در ژورنال اسلام معاصر منتشر شد.

Integration, class and secularism: the marginalization of Shia identities in the UK Iranian diaspora

Abstract

Despite ongoing debates about the nature and role of multiculturalism in the UK, the idea of integration remains significant in British immigration policies and community relations, and it orients itself towards second and third-generation diasporans as well as recent arrivals. Drawing on original data from the UK Iranian diaspora, this paper aims to complicate extant debates by exploring the cultural dimensions of integration mainly at the intra-diasporic level. Particularly among secular middle-class UK Iranians, ‘integration’ acts as an idiom for being a ‘good’, ‘successful’, ‘proper’ Iranian, and a failure to integrate is often described as unacceptable and even shameful. Integration in this sense mirrors dominant neo-liberal attitudes and puts huge pressure on Iranians to constantly ‘do better’ in cultural and economic terms to justify their presence in the UK. Crucially, these processes are predicated on a critique and/or rejection of Iranian Shiism and Islam in general, thus helping to marginalize Iranian Shia identities in representations of Iranian-ness in the British mainstream. We argue, therefore, that dominant policies and discourses of integration, regardless of their stated intention, intersect with the multiple and competing realities that exist in a diasporic community to produce particular social and cultural relations which may exclude identities protected under UK law. However, we also draw comparison with the US to suggest that these dynamics might begin to change in the near future.

References

  1. Al-Ahmad, J. (1984). Occidentosis (gharbzadegi). London: Mizan Press.Google Scholar

  2. Alinejad, D. (2017). The internet and formations of Iranian American-ness: Next generation diaspora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  3. APPG (2017) Integration not demonisation. Available online at: http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/themes/570513f1b504f500db000001/attachments/original/1503672973/TC0016_AAPG_Integration_not_Demonisation_Report_1-Page_view.pdf?1503672973 (accessed 24/04/2018).

  4. Gholami, R. (2015). Secularism and identity: Non-Islamiosity in the Iranian diaspora.London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  5. Gholami, R. (2017). Beyond myths of ‘Muslim education’: A case study of two Iranian schools in London. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 798–۸۱۱٫  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  6. Jarvis, L., Atakav, E. and Marsden, L. (2017) What British Muslims think about the term ‘British values’ The Conversation, available online at: http://theconversation.com/what-british-muslims-think-about-the-term-british-values-86423 (accessed 30/07/2018).

  7. Keddie, N. (2003). Modern Iran: Roots and results of revolution. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  8. Kundnani, A. (2007). Integrationism: The politics of anti-Muslim racism. Race and Class, 48(4), 24–۴۴٫CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  9. Lessard-Phillips L. and Galandini S. (2015) Immigrant integration in British society. Economic and Social Research Council – Evidence briefing. Available online at: http://projects.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/unity-out-of-diversity/publications/(22/07/2018).

  10. Maghbouleh, N. (2017) The limits of whiteness: Iranian Americans and the everyday politics of race, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  11. Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2014). Cosmopolitanism and integrationism: Is British multiculturalism a ‘zombie category’? Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 21(6), 658–۶۷۴٫CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  12. Milani, M. (2018) The making of Iran’s Islamic revolution: From Monarchy to Islamic Republic. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  13. Modood, T. (2012). Post-immigration ‘difference’ and integration: The case of Muslims in Western Europe. A report prepared for the British Academy.Google Scholar

  14. Muslim Council of Britain (2015). Meeting between David Anderson QC and the MCB: Concerns on prevent. Retrieved from https://www.mcb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/20150803-Case-studiesabout-Prevent.pdf (۲۷/۰۲/۲۰۱۸).

  15. Muslims in Britain (n.d.). Islam’s Place in the World and in Britain. Retrieved from http://guide.muslimsinbritain.org/guide3.html (accessed 10/10/2017).

  16. Novelli, M. (2017). Education and countering violent extremism: Western logics from south to north?. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, issue and no? doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1341301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  17. Open Society (2016). Eroding trust: The UK’s prevent counter-extremism strategy in health and education. Retrieved from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/erodingtrust-20161017_0.pdf (۲۷/۰۲/۲۰۱۸).

  18. Paige, S., Hatfield, E. and Lian, L. (2015) How welcome do Iranian-Americans feel in their homeland? Perceptions of social distance among Muslim, Jewish, and Non-Religious Iranian-American adults. SpringerPlus 4: 747. Available online at:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1531-4.

  19. Spellman, K. (2004). Religion and nation: Iranian local and transnational networks in Britain. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

  20. Sreberny, A., and Gholami, R. (2016). Iranian communities in Britain. London: London Middle East Institute, SOAS, University of London. Retrieved from https://www.soas.ac.uk/lmei-cis/events/file113142.pdf (accessed 03/09/2018).

  21. Sreberny, A., and Gholami, R. (in press). The politics of diasporic integration: The case of Iranians in Britain”, in R. Tzagarousianou and Rettis, J. (eds). Handbook on Diasporas, Media and Culture. London: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

  22. Tehranian, J. (2009). Whitewashed: America’s invisible middle eastern minority. New York and London: New York University press.Google Scholar

  23. Wieviorka, M. (2014). A critique of integration. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 21(6), 633–۶۴۱٫CrossRefGoogle Scholar

مطالب مرتبط